Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
harm van den dorpel
[all harm van den dorpel. from the series sudden flare in total darkness. 2009.]
Posted by
laurel
at
8:09 AM
Labels: 2000s, digitalness, europe, harm van den dorpel, installation, netherlands
Saturday, March 7, 2009
this weekend
At Capricious Space
103 Broadway Brooklyn, NY 11211
(between Bedford and Berry)
718.384.1208
Saturday 7 March
12–4pm
VVORK
VVORK will invite a male stripper to the gallery space whose task will be to perform a 4-hour slow strip while surfing the internet.
4–8pm
Ffffound
Renda Morton and Samuel Sherman, contributors to the website Ffffound, will assemble and go about ffffounding as usual, except in public, and for 4 hours straight.
8–10pm
Opening / Roundtable Discussion: Browser As Exhibition Space
Participants from the exhibition IN REAL LIFE including Art Fag City, Club Internet, Ffffound, The Highlights, Humble Arts Foundation, Platform For Pedagogy, Private Circulation, UbuWeb, Why + Wherefore, and others will collectively discuss the concept of browser as exhibition space. Moderated by Laurel Ptak. Reception to follow.
Sunday 8 March
12–4pm
Private Circulation
Lance Wakeling will email the fifteenth installment of Private Circulation, featuring a project by artist Martijn Hendriks. There will be coffee and tea as well as a 4-hour slideshow and mix tape session.
4–8pm
Club Internet
All members of Club Internet will be invited to sit behind their computers, either at home or in the gallery, as Harm van den Dorpel announces the curatorial criteria for them to create a new work on the spot and participate in an opening party—all within 4 hours. The resulting show will remain online for one month at clubinternet.org.
Full details about IN REAL LIFE here.
Posted by
laurel
at
8:26 AM
Labels: club internet, ffffound, harm van den dorpel, in real life, lance wakeling, martijn hendriks, private circulation, vvork
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
harm van den dorpel
[all harm van den dorpel. saturation transition. 2009.]
Posted by
laurel
at
12:38 PM
Labels: 2000s, digitalness, europe, harm van den dorpel, netherlands
Friday, October 24, 2008
video • youtube
meta youtube work by constant dullaart, ben coonley, pash*, julien levesque, ginger anyhow, seecoy, and harm van den dorpel. thanks to john for the links. please also see ed halter's piece at rhizome on the subject.
video is a brand-new weekly column by michael bühler-rose that appears each friday on i heart photograph.
Posted by
Michael
at
10:00 AM
Labels: 2000s, ben coonley, club internet, constant dullaart, europe, ginger anyhow, harm van den dorpel, julien levesque, north america, pash, seecoy, video, youtube
Saturday, September 6, 2008
club internet 4.0
[all from club internet 4.0: k.i.s.s. 2008. top to bottom: jonathan puckey. delaunay raster. harm van den dorpel. forest/lines. chris coy. excaliber. victor boullet. digression.]
Posted by
laurel
at
8:21 AM
Labels: 2000s, chris coy, club internet, constant dullaart, exhibitions, harm van den dorpel, jonathan puckey, victor boullet, websites
Friday, June 20, 2008
club internet
[all club internet. from the oracle show. top to bottom: dreamcaptchas by kari altmann. still from edge transfer by damon zucconi. still from resurrections by harm van den dorpel.]
Posted by
laurel
at
9:53 AM
Labels: club internet, damon zucconi, exhibitions, harm van den dorpel, kari altmann
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
interview • harm van den dorpel
i heart photograph: is this image part of a larger project, and if so, could you explain the basic ideas/impulse behind the work?
harm van den dorpel: this work is part of my project 'semantics'. it is a series of manipulated found images. after applying one action or manipulation i put them back online. in computer programming 'semantics' is opposed to 'syntax'. when i look at media i am always struck by the (stupidity of) visual conventions and expectations; these are these syntactic rules. purposely i generate a syntax error in the visual language of the photos. after the images are processed on a lower layer, they become mine, and carry completely other meaning or emotions.
i.h.p.: the way the image is collaged, it reminds me of natural history displays, except what's being presented is very unnatural and not explained like things in those museums are. i'm wondering if you could talk about the image in relation to ideas of display and (natural) history.
h.v.d.d.: the reason i like to use pictures of animals is because they are close to humans (i tend to consider human beings partly animals too). there's one big distinction when using footage of animals rather than people: photos of animals are not portraits. they are anonymous illustrations of a species. therefore nobody will wonder why i chose this particular ostrich. in this manipulated photo, which i call a reconfiguration, i try to create a confusion between real and impossible. until what point do we still believe a representation? the cliché thought about ostriches is their hiding behavior, putting their head in the ground. i like to do this too in my work. by hiding or taking the original meaning away, the only meaning left is that of a bare and empty visual language. i think there is a lot of beauty in these residues.
Posted by
Anonymous
at
7:49 AM
Labels: 2000s, animals, harm van den dorpel, interview, netherlands
Monday, December 10, 2007
harm van den dorpel
[all harm van den dorpel. 2007. top (left to right): still from resurrection 2. still from sleepwalker 3. bottom (left to right): still from sleepwalker 1. still from resurrection 1.]
Posted by
laurel
at
9:00 AM
Labels: 2000s, animation, europe, found photos, harm van den dorpel, netherlands























